Factors Affecting the Audit Quality in Bangladesh





Audit, Audit Quality, Audit Fee, Bangladesh


Main Objectives: The study mainly focused on different factors which actually affects the audit quality. The principal goal of the report is to comprehend the association between quality and various variables of audit influencing it. Background Problems: In Bangladesh, a series of market crash and manipulated financial statements questioned the audit quality which as a consequence degraded market confidence. Identification of the influential factors towards audit quality can be the steppingstone towards facing the problematic situation. Novelty: 11 factors along with new factor like external manager review was incorporated to work with and to see the impact of each factors. This was unique in nature as the combination of factors were not researched before. Research Methods: Descriptive statistics and Regression model were used for the analysis. The samples were collected randomly which mainly included article students of different firms. Paper based survey was conducted to bring out the responses. The regression model helped us to formulate the significant components which mostly affected the essence of auditing and its nature.  Finding /Results: Audit quality was perceived high, and the respondents assumed that audit review by an external manager of the team had considerable amount of influence over audit quality followed by internal control. It was also visualized that number of client/assignments of a firm inversely impact the audit quality. Contributions: The influential factors were identified which can be studied or regulated to retain the reliability and confidence of the market which is significantly influenced by the audit quality. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the study was successful in identifying the factors affecting the audit quality in Bangladesh which creates an avenue for the concerns to look into the subject for improvisation.


Alzeban, A. (2019). The relationship between internal control and internal audit recommendations. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 48(3), 341-362.

Arens, A. A. E., Beasley, R. J., Best, M. S., Shailer, P. J., & Fielder, G. E. P. (2011). Auditing, Assurance Service and Ethics in Australia, Pearson Australia, 8th Edition.

Gavious, I. (2007). Alternative perspectives to deal with auditors’ agency problem, Critical

Perspectives on Accounting, 18(4), 451–467.

Hai, P. T., Toan, L. D., & Quy, N. L. (2019). Effect of audit rotation, audit fee and auditor competence to motivation auditor and audit quality: Empirical evidence in Vietnam, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23, 2.

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(1), 139–151.

Hien, N. A., Tram, H. V., Ha, D. T., Huong, N. C., & Hang, N. P. (2019). Factors affecting the audit quality and the competitive capability of auditing enterprises in ho chi minh city. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23, 3.

Ismail, A. H., Merejok, N. M., Dangi, M. R. M., & Saad, S. (2020). Does audit quality matters in Malaysian public sector auditing? Journal of Academia, 7, 102-116.

Joshua L. Gunn, Brett S. Kawada, & Paul N. Michas, (2019). Audit market concentration, audit fees, and audit quality: A cross-country analysis of complex audit clients. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38, 6.

Kertarajasa, A., Marwa, T., & Wahyudi, T. (2019). The effect of competence, experience, independence, due professional care, and auditor integrity on audit quality with auditor ethics as moderating variable. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 5(1), 80-99.

Löhlein, L., (2016). From peer review to PCAOB inspections: regulating for audit quality in the U.S. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36, 28-47.

Mala, R., & Chand, P. (2015). Judgment and decision-making research in auditing and accounting: Future research implications of person, task, and environment perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 14(1), 1-50.

Momodu, A. L. I. U., Joshua, O., & Nma, M. (2018). Audit Fees and Audit Quality: A Study of Listed Companies in the Downstream Sector of Nigerian Petroleum Industry. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 6(2), 59-73.

Molla, M. (2019). Cause and Effect Analysis of Stock Market Crash during 2010-11 and Investors Impression. The Case of Dhaka Stock Exchange. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15, 71–86.

Munro, L., & Stewart, J. (2011). External auditors' reliance on internal auditing: Further evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26, 464-481.

Postma, E. (2016). The effects of audit firm rotation on audit quality: does audit firm rotation improve audit quality? (Master's thesis, University of Twente).

Qawqzeh, H. K., Endut, W. A., Rashid, N., Johari, R. J., Hamid, N. A., & Rasit, Z. A. (2018). Auditor Tenure, Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality: A Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1314–1324.

Rennie, M. D. & L. S. Kopp. (2010). Exploring Trust and the Auditor-Client Relationship. Working Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 279-293.

Salehi, M., Fakhri Mahmoudi, M.R. & Daemi Gah, A. (2019). A meta-analysis approach for determinants of effective factors on audit quality: Evidence from emerging market, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(2), 287-312.

Sari, D. K. (2018). Audit Specialization and Audit Quality: The Role of Client’s Business Strategy. KnE Social Sciences, 144-172.

Sheikh, A. Q., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020). Impact of Audit Fees and Audit Firm’s Reputation on Audit Quality: Evidence from Listed Companies from Pakistan. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3681321 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681321

Younas, M. A., & Kassim, A. A. M. (2019). Essentiality of internal control in Audit process. International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science. 1-6.



How to Cite

Reza, M. M. U., & Towfiquzzaman. (2021). Factors Affecting the Audit Quality in Bangladesh. International Fellowship Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4718559